Verified timeline

  1. Players identify suspected generated assets

    Eurogamer says players spotted signs of generative AI in in-game paintings from the Prologue and in related marketing material.

  2. A reported apology and commitment

    Eurogamer reports that Panache apologized and said AI use would not appear in the full game. This guide has not located the original apology URL, so this item remains media-attributed.

  3. Désilets explains the pipeline

    In Eurogamer’s published interview, Désilets said some assets had not been sufficiently retouched, said the final game would not contain AI use, and acknowledged the team was still using AI tools less and less during production.

The distinction that matters

“Not in the final product” and “not used anywhere in production” are different claims. The interview describes ongoing pipeline use while promising exclusion from shipped assets.

This page does not independently identify which assets were generated, quantify their number, or claim that the final commitment has already been audited. Those would require primary assets and a later build review.

Audit trail

Sources used on this page

Sources support only the claims described beside them. Independent guides and community reports remain attributed; neither is promoted to an official result.